Start from realistic inputs
Provide a cleanly documented workbook with a manageable number of rows, clear field names, and intentional data-quality issues relevant to the job.
A spreadsheet test should resemble the work the role actually requires. Instead of asking candidates to memorize obscure functions, give them a small, synthetic workbook and assess whether they can produce an accurate, readable, auditable result.
Provide a cleanly documented workbook with a manageable number of rows, clear field names, and intentional data-quality issues relevant to the job.
Ask the candidate to clean specified fields, calculate agreed metrics, and create a summary table or chart. State whether formulas, pivot tables, or another method are acceptable.
Ask for the .xlsx file plus a short note about checks performed. Configure optional required-sheet or required-column checks when useful, then have reviewers inspect the calculations and presentation.
| Criterion | Evidence to look for |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | Key calculations match the supplied definitions and sample checks. |
| Method | The workbook uses a suitable, understandable approach that can be checked by another person. |
| Usability | Sheets, labels, formats, and summaries make the result straightforward to review. |
| Quality assurance | The candidate checks edge cases and explains any assumptions or unresolved data issues. |
Evalynq can accept and store .xlsx submissions and optionally flag missing configured sheets or columns. It does not execute or recalculate formulas, macros, or external links; reviewers must verify the actual work.
Build a timed assessment, share the instructions and files candidates need, review structured and practical answers, and release results only when your team is ready. The details of the task and scoring remain yours.
See the setup guide, review a sample report, or compare options on pricing.
Explore other use cases →